Right now I'm currently developing the third installment of the
Mrs. Hawking play series the continuing story of a steampunk superhero who is a lady version of Batman and Sherlock Holmes. I have begun the challenging process of plotting it out, and it's clear that this will significantly harder than what I've done before.
First of all, this third piece will be a true mystery, as opposed to
a caper like the first two stories. In
Mrs. Hawking and
Vivat Regina, our heroes are presented with a problem rather than a question. "Foil a blackmailer and return a kidnapped child." "Bring a monster to justice who is hiding behind diplomatic immunity." Mrs. Hawking and Mary knew what they were going after, and their challenge was to figure out how to accomplish it. In a mystery, however, they have to investigate to find out the answer to what's gone on. That's a very different story design process, as it requires the slow unfolding of the truth based on the gathering of clues, which is really tough to do in a theatrical medium. Think about it; most mystery stories require lots of people to interview and places to investigate, while in theater you have to minimize both locations and characters in order to make staging feasible. The few theatrical mysteries tend to be of the "locked room" variety, to keep both suspect pool and number of settings down.
I'm trying to use that "locked room" model after a fashion for that very reason. Still, this play is going to have a LOT of speaking characters, there's just no way around it. We've got
our three leads, of course, and we're starting to build up a cast of supporting characters we want to recur and develop-- in this case, Nathaniel's wife
Clara and
Arthur, the policeman Mary befriended. I also want to include Nathaniel's brother
Justin Hawking, and of course there's going to have to be all the characters specifically involved in the mystery.
But we're trying to concern ourselves more with telling the best possible story than with "production stuff" yet. Writing a compelling mystery will be tough enough on its own. I've been watching a ton of mysteries lately for research, and we're going to be working out a lot of kinks. Wish us luck! I want the next installment of this story to continue the upward trajectory of the last two.
I struggle a great deal with titles; though I’m pretty happy with
"Mrs. Hawking" and
"Vivat Regina,” I rarely think I’ve come up with good ones. But I have an idea, at least, of what I’d like to call this third story. I’m leaning towards either “Base Instruments,” regarding to the imperfections of those people who struggle to deliver grand results. The first two have a quality of irony about them, which I would like to maintain in this third title if possible.